法律英语导读 (36)-ag真人试玩平台
章节正文
case example 1: officer furlong searches a residence for evidence of bookmaking pursuant to a search . the officer obtained the by submitting to a magistrate an affidavit containing statements known by the officer to be false.
question: is the search valid because it was conducted pursuant to a ?
answer: no. by submitting a false affidavit, officer furlong did not act "in good faith." the search was thus , and whatever it turned up is inadmissible in evidence.
case example 2: officer cal ebrate stops a for a traffic . a computer check of the driver's license reveals the existence of an arrest for the driver. officer ebrate places the driver under arrest, searches the car and finds drugs. it later turns out that the computer record was wrong, and that an arrest did not in fact exist.
question: are the drugs admissible in evidence against the driver?
answer: yes. the officer acted in good-faith reliance on the computer record. the seizure was therefore valid even though the record was wrong. （arizona v. evans, u.s. sup. ct. 1995.）
15. if the police have a warrant to search my backyard for marijuana plants, can they legally search the inside of my house as well?
no. the police can only search the place described in a , and usually can only seize whatever property the describes. the police cannot search a house if the specifies the backyard, nor can they search for weapons if the specifies marijuana plants. however, this does not mean that police officers can only seize items listed in the . should police officers come across contraband or evidence of a crime that is not listed in the in the course of searching for stuff that is listed, they can lawfully seize the unlisted items.
"well, look what we have here"
the rule that police officers can seize items not listed in a search in the course of searching for the stuff that is listed creates obvious disincentives for police to list all the items they hope to find. for example, perhaps a police officer suspects that a carries a weapon, but can't establish probable cause to search for it. no problem. the officer can obtain a search for other items, and then seize a weapon if the officer comes upon it in the course of the search. the 's only hope of invalidating the seizure of the weapon would be to convince a judge that the officer did not just happen to come across the weapon, but in fact searched for it.
关键字:法律英语导读
生词表:
question: is the search valid because it was conducted pursuant to a ?
answer: no. by submitting a false affidavit, officer furlong did not act "in good faith." the search was thus , and whatever it turned up is inadmissible in evidence.
case example 2: officer cal ebrate stops a for a traffic . a computer check of the driver's license reveals the existence of an arrest for the driver. officer ebrate places the driver under arrest, searches the car and finds drugs. it later turns out that the computer record was wrong, and that an arrest did not in fact exist.
question: are the drugs admissible in evidence against the driver?
answer: yes. the officer acted in good-faith reliance on the computer record. the seizure was therefore valid even though the record was wrong. （arizona v. evans, u.s. sup. ct. 1995.）
15. if the police have a warrant to search my backyard for marijuana plants, can they legally search the inside of my house as well?
no. the police can only search the place described in a , and usually can only seize whatever property the describes. the police cannot search a house if the specifies the backyard, nor can they search for weapons if the specifies marijuana plants. however, this does not mean that police officers can only seize items listed in the . should police officers come across contraband or evidence of a crime that is not listed in the in the course of searching for stuff that is listed, they can lawfully seize the unlisted items.
"well, look what we have here"
the rule that police officers can seize items not listed in a search in the course of searching for the stuff that is listed creates obvious disincentives for police to list all the items they hope to find. for example, perhaps a police officer suspects that a carries a weapon, but can't establish probable cause to search for it. no problem. the officer can obtain a search for other items, and then seize a weapon if the officer comes upon it in the course of the search. the 's only hope of invalidating the seizure of the weapon would be to convince a judge that the officer did not just happen to come across the weapon, but in fact searched for it.
关键字:法律英语导读
生词表:
- [i´li:gəl]
a.不合法的，非法的 六级词汇 - [´wɔrənt] n.根据；委任书；权利 四级词汇
- [im´prɔpə] a.不恰当的；不正确的 六级词汇
- [´məutərist] n.开汽车的人 四级词汇
- [,vaiə´leiʃən] n.破坏；冒犯；侵害 四级词汇
- [´li:gəli] ad.合法地 六级词汇
- [di´fendənt] n.&a.被告(人)(的) 六级词汇
文章标签:
章节正文
